Leonard

Hi Fred, thanks for testing the install. Once the port is complete, my hope is it will be enough to have 1 wheel which is platform-independent, so that will simplify...

Dear Fred, thanks a lot for your support! I haven't had a chance to check the Gauss functions in detail, but they look OK. I will try to test them...

Dear mikessut, I'm afraid I can't help out much, the original code is basically as old as I am. However, during the porting to pure Python last year I also...

Hi feature-engineer, this depends on the details I guess. A 1D simulation is not the same as a 2D Nx1 simulation. In your case, do you assume infinite extent in...

Dear @Jackzeng999, your question is regarding the argument order, correct? We changed this in LightPipes 2.0 so that the Field is always first (new way). This allows many optional arguments...

Hi yellow-force, this should be possible with LightPipes. For the forward direction, start with an empty field (LP.Begin) and overlay your phase with MultPhase or SubPhase. Propagate this to the...

I gave it a quick try, you were very close. The output image looked very dark and wrong, but viewing in log scale revealed the problem: You need to use...

This bugged me also and I played around once more. The answer is a missing square between intensity and field magnitude! * The image you load is usually an intensity...

Dear Vicky, I think you just got the units wrong. In LightPipes the default units for Zernike polynomials is optical path length, i.e. [m]. This follows from the definition of...

Dear Ivan, sorry that no-one got back to you quicker, I personally have been very busy in the past months and could not look after LightPipes much. This is indeed...