Laurent Demailly
Laurent Demailly
Thanks for the headsup, I would need to familiarize myself with operators as I am not. Is this just fyi or I should review it? thanks
Thanks for the kind words. Yes it's been on my mind since #278 but it's not exactly a small change
In the meantime this can sort of be achieved by adding a side car
for the command line the flag to use and combo around the proxy feature is interesting. so is the grpc -cert option
and https://github.com/envoyproxy/nighthawk
cc @carolynhu is working on comparing with nighthawk (thanks!)
My understanding is that when fortio reports negative sleep times (ie can't reach the target QPS) one option is to count that falling behind as part of the response time...
yes if you see the warning it means your target system is unable to sustain the requested qps.
@wiardvanrij ptal if you have time
checking pre3 build and release artifacts once done, and will merge and tag 1.35.0 is all checks out