ldeffenb

Results 90 comments of ldeffenb

I should also mention that in my observations, when the depth of a node drops significantly, the puller gets over-activate thinking that it needs to pull a lot more chunks...

Would this happen if the content was pinned or otherwise still present in the uploading node?

I suspect the issue results from the way in which the website-index-document is resolved and retrieved. IIRC, it doesn't redirect to the referenced document, but attempts to resolve it directly...

Is there a possible oscillation here? I have one batch that just unreserved 3,579,137 chunks in my reserve. Since the reserve capacity is just under 5,000,000 chunks, that means that...

![StorageRadius-1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5175026/175946204-4d62e914-0ca5-4e04-9632-fca81e34a4de.png) ![StorageRadius-2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5175026/175946217-1462e886-4b7f-4122-bb1e-e8c245243b60.png) And headed to yet another Unreserve eviction when Storage Radius goes to 4, hopefully later today or tomorrow.

And a new behavior. Any idea why the Storage Radius incremented twice in quick succession? I'll be providing logs for this later today. ``` time="2022-06-28T18:18:12+02:00" level=debug msg="batchstore: Unreserve callback batch...

![StorageRadius-3](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5175026/176242271-b41f9dd9-e07f-4051-b7e7-92038303fe58.png) ![StorageRadius-4](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5175026/176242281-78ef8504-ad48-4f3d-864a-cfadf42d772e.png)

bee version - 1.6.2-684a7384-dirty Dirty is due to additional pin counter logging, pinning and stewardship do not traverse manifests, increased kademlia connection limits /reservestate: { "radius": 11, "storageRadius": 5, "commitment":...

I've worked around this issue on my own major pinning node by hacking the code so that any API-based pins (from uploading and explicit pinning) increment the pin counter by...

When you re-pin an existing pin from the API, nothing actually happens in the bee node. It just returns success. But if chunks have been unpinned below that reference, possibly...