Luis Diogo Couto

1. If we have a custom comparison method that method needs to be wrapped in an assertTrue. When this method fails, there is no notion of expected or actual to...

We could but we'd have to work out the work flow for that. How would you suggest we do it? At the moment the lone comparison method gets called automatically...

Right guys. I have updated the framework to implement the features we discussed (branch ldc/ntf. Should be safe to merge. The changes are backwards-compatible). I've also begun writing the documentation...

Right, the thing I can't figure out is how will the framework tell which one the user has overridden. Plus, I want something that's conceptually simple and I can't find...

Ok, the wiki page is updated. There is some advanced stuff TBD but let's wait until people use it and see if it's useful. You can check out the new...

Arise, ancient bug report, arise! @nickbattle , we have some students working on the code coverage plug-in. They can maybe take a look at this as part of their work...

Hmm... Doesn't the entire AndExp have a lexlocation? It should have a start and end point and we should just paint everything in the middle. You'd have to ensure that...

I don't think it has ever been changed. I see that there are some cases of locations being hit outside the breakpoint check -- for example: the assignments in the...

I think there are two sides to any of this coverage stuff. One is the recording of the hit counts during execution. Efficiency is the main concern here since we...

Are you suggesting we start moving `hit()` calls out of the `breakpoint()`? When I say that we need to work out whether a composite construct is covered, that's a post-execution...