Laurent Broudoux

Just updated the issue name to scope it to `1.9.1` release (for now 😉)

Hi @mcruzdev ! I'm gonna close this issue as `1.9.1` is now ready for release. New tests are more than welcome but it will be on another branch to prepare...

> Are we ok with the Train Travel API using this slightly more clunky OpenAPI for named examples? If not... I had mentioned to Microcks about supporting single example instead...

> 100% agree with the overlays proposal: it will allow us to add advanced examples for mocking purpose without havint to complexify the original definition 👍 We recently put together...

Hi @philsturgeon I'm sorry, but I think my previous comment about overlay was ambiguous. Actually, we don't support an OpenAPI overlay spec that uses patch-like commands. What we do support...

Hey @philsturgeon, @ChristopheDujarric, @scharrier and Bump.sh team! The Train API is now available on https://hub.microcks.io! You can check it out directly here: https://hub.microcks.io/package/bump.sh The Mocks have also been loaded on...

Hey @philsturgeon, thanks for the follow-up (still on the weekend 😉 ) If you connect on https://try.microcks.io using `guest`/`guest`, you can see in the **Importers** section that I created an...

Reading more about this, I realize that [Client-Side Field Level Encryption](https://www.mongodb.com/docs/v7.0/core/csfle/) is different from [Encryption at Rest](https://www.mongodb.com/docs/manual/core/security-encryption-at-rest/). So I wonder if enabling CSFL is actually necessary, given that TLS +...

Thank you for opening this issue. You provide a lot of helpful details that may certainly accelerate the investigation. I'll probably be able to have a look at it tomorrow.

Hi there! So actually, this is an issue on Microcks side and not on the side of the testcontainers module. `serviceId` as used in the API path has —most of...