Laura Barcziová
Laura Barcziová
@sergiomb2 yes, I will try to onboard that today, thanks!
@sergiomb2 I will have a look at it.
Recently several improvements regarding this were implemented: storing the package configuration in DB, not running private repo check for result events and optimizing getting the PR info via API; so...
@mfocko can we merge this like this or should we resolve the error?
Agreed on onboarding, created a PR for python-pikepdf: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pikepdf/pull-request/8, currently fails on https://github.com/packit/packit-service/issues/2514.
python-pikepdf onboarded :partying_face:
hi @janhavlin. This makes sense to me and would be a nice improvement. As for the implementation, it could be a new comment command (e.g. `/packit test-cancel ) or something...
This is still valid, see https://github.com/packit/hello-world/pull/494#issuecomment-1339253487
The problem is staging should not react to that PR (packit_instances is not specified in the config => by default only prod app should react) and it correctly did not...
Current TODO: - [ ] #2454 - [ ] #2463 - [ ] packit/packit.dev#899