lawrenceccheung

For another data point on the ADM runs, we've been running some comparisons using a neutral 6.3 m/s precursor and the NREL 2.8-127 turbine model. Using the OpenFAST+ADM model in...

Hi @StormMata, Also, what you're showing with AMR-Wind is generally the correct behavior in front of the turbine. There's an induction zone ahead of the rotor which causes the flow...

hi @StormMata, Regarding the induction values, the uniform Ct disk model should get a pretty good value for the rotor disk velocities, but it won't be perfect, especially for higher...

This is actually using the same case as https://github.com/Exawind/amr-wind/issues/1009, the domain should resemble this:  but with only levels 0 and 1. If you turn off refinement (only have level...

I've often wondered about the effect of a refinement zone intersecting the bottom boundary. We have other cases where it successfully ran without hitting issues in the MLMG solver, and...

I'm working on getting a debug build on the Sandia side. Yeah, the stack trace that @arswalid and @marchdf see might be an openfast related compile problem, and it seems...

Hi @WeiqunZhang, we saw a similar issue with another case detailed here: https://github.com/Exawind/amr-wind/issues/941. In that set up, the refinement zones did not go outside the domain, although they did coincide...

Quick update: the problem occurs somewhere between 257c13c1a634d841627a04f83f1923b2a8556ca5 (May 1) and the current commit a75d2ec013e15c567faa5873098a35a7b484c06a. Lawrence

Yes, the latest bisection I did shows that the problem is happening somewhere between bbe0fddb and https://github.com/Exawind/amr-wind/commit/a75d2ec013e15c567faa5873098a35a7b484c06a. I also tried the very latest commit (4b71037), and that also maxes out...

@asalmgren -- they're run with the amrex library as a submodule. Everything's been built with spack-manager. Lawrence