Gerhard Lausser
Gerhard Lausser
@infraweavers did you update and what was the result?
Well, everything works for our customers. So, even if something would be cool or nice...i have plenty of other things to do in my free time :-)
The change in Device.pm means that without it, Classes::Juniper::SRX would be chosen. And this class does not use the Juniper-specific BGP code, but a more generic one. I rewrote Device.pm...
"That said, I stumbled upon another issue with the mitigation function in the Classes::Juniper." What exactly did the issue look like?
Well, no answer after a week. Then fix that yourself.
You can add -vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv (just an insane high number of v, i think more than 10) to see hat happens inside. Or, if it is possible, run ..... --mode walk...
Holt dei Fotzn!
You are not the only one. Can you put this code in a file mininwc.pl please? ``` #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use Getopt::Long; use Net::SNMP; # Initialize a hash...
Ah, you have 4 cpus. So you can change foreach my $idx (1..16) { to foreach my $idx (1..4) { It's very strange that this mini-example shows plausible values, but...
When you let it run 100 times, can you estimate if there are more good results than bad results? And for how many cycles the bad result is returned before...