laurentsimon

Results 281 issues of laurentsimon

In https://github.com/slsa-framework/slsa-verifier/pull/257, I added support for builder tag verification. All the existing generic container tests use a builder pinned at `@main`. It works because of the exception for example-package repository....

area:cli
area:gha
area:tests

I'm seeing some warnings when using the git command: ``` remote: warning: See http://git.io/iEPt8g for more information. remote: warning: File 278574a27b5008ce50cfe31c787cd00f0d7e6ea4 is 54.86 MB; this is larger than GitHub's recommended...

area:tooling
type:refactor

type confusion in https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/security/advisories/GHSA-vjxv-45g9-9296 I don't think we explicitly check for this... but we check for builders who only support SLSA attestation. Still, let's make the check more explicit, unless...

type:feature

We don't have tests for these. For GCB, it's particularly important since multiple provenances may be contained in the gcloud provenance.

type:feature
area:tests

When we bump the major version, we need to update the go.mod and all the imports in the file. See https://github.com/slsa-framework/slsa-verifier/issues/299 and https://github.com/slsa-framework/slsa-verifier/pull/378 for context. We may want to add...

area:tooling
area:tests

We need to release the Action. TODOs: - [x] Fix checkout I tested (https://github.com/laurentsimon/slsa-on-github-test/blob/main/.github/workflows/verifier-action.yaml#L11): ``` uses: slsa-framework/slsa-verifier/actions/[email protected] ``` and it gave me the following error: ```Error: An error occurred trying...

area:installer
type:task

For defense in depth, we should verify these against the signing certificate, print these, and also in the future expose options for clients to create policies to verify these against.

type:feature

See original discusssion https://github.com/gossts/slsa-provenance/issues/21

type:feature

We need a better story around installation, like a native debian package. Work items: - [x] File a WNPP ITP bug (https://wiki.debian.org/ITP) Done https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019904 - [ ] Refresh knowledge on...

type:feature
area:tooling

Do we need to start thinking of a SLSA level flag during verification? This could encourage users to use our tool for verification, even when the provenance has lower levels,...

type:discussion