latot
latot
Extra need things, due to this issue: https://github.com/r-lib/rcmdcheck/issues/218 If we use a library inside a assertion like I used ```geotypes``` we need to have something like this: ```R dummy
that is a completely new way to do it! I think I would like to test it. I already have a library using types, and creating a new one that...
here other thing to add to the docs: https://github.com/moodymudskipper/typed/issues/58
@moodymudskipper Hi, is possible to fix this? thx!
@moodymudskipper don't worry, I'm using the dev one, the CRAN version needs a lot of fixes that are here, is not very usable for libs u.u While the only two...
When we create a custom assertion, we can also use other assertions for it, but what would be the right way to call an assertion that is used internally? ```f```...
Mmm, I think > This would be in part answered by #26 (restrict the type using a prototype in place of an assertion) > > Or it can be done...
@moodymudskipper Would you agree changes like I proposed here? I can send a PR and you can review it.
:O I see, so the intention of the lib is not have the "base" types for use, is more focused on the base to use custom types. In that case,...
Just to know, which ones would be the main compromises of the lib? is good to know (and read it from the README) to see if focus a feature here...