Laszlo Fogas
Laszlo Fogas
Closing as development continues on the [Capacitor Next](https://github.com/gimlet-io/capacitor?tab=readme-ov-file#capacitor-next---currently-under-development) code tree.
Can you retest with the latest version?
Closing as development continues on the [Capacitor Next](https://github.com/gimlet-io/capacitor?tab=readme-ov-file#capacitor-next---currently-under-development) code tree.
Closing as development continues on the [Capacitor Next](https://github.com/gimlet-io/capacitor?tab=readme-ov-file#capacitor-next---currently-under-development) code tree.
Wow, maybe you have a race condition between kustomizations? One has it, the other does not, and it deletes it immediately?
Can you try with 0.4.4?
I am making this a duplicate of https://github.com/gimlet-io/capacitor/issues/118 As we now support RBAC, capacitor will check if the user is allowed to perform the action. If so, the button will...
@frittentheke Amazing. This did it for us. Now we have utilization metrics for MIG partitions 🥳
You mean the issue us that all sealedsecrets are cluster wide? `sealedsecrets.bitnami.com/cluster-wide: "true"` We could make that configurable.
Closing as development continues on the [Capacitor Next](https://github.com/gimlet-io/capacitor?tab=readme-ov-file#capacitor-next---currently-under-development) code tree. Next respects Kubernetes RBAC.