Michael Mayer

@pjft Thank you! That's good to know, since the feedback we've received on the optimizations hasn't been very enthusiastic so far. Most users didn't seem to notice (or care about)...

We will change how manually labeled faces are clustered and compared in one of the upcoming releases. This should solve the remaining issues.

Unfortunately, we haven't had time to work on this yet. We will reference this issue in the related commits and mention it in the release notes once the improvements are...

Frontend dependencies have already been upgraded in https://github.com/photoprism/photoprism/commit/84a4c3c57e8e430dbedf803e0f18071549fc9b1b.

I've decided to request the list of pictures from the backend as dynamically computing the list in the format for the viewer proofed to be slower in many cases, especially...

From what I remember, it was the `generateThumbs()` function that caused a significant slowdown when testing with large result sets. While PhotoSwipe could be refactored to work with our own...

It could also be that the viewer is used in other places where the photo metadata is incomplete or in an incompatible format. By loading the pictures for the viewer...

Yeah, the problem is probably that the upload is indeed successful, but the indexing fails. We don't yet know if all files can be indexed properly with all metadata, etc....

What would be a good solution (apart from never having problems with indexing)? Show another message that says "Sorry, upload was not successful, ignore the previous information"?

Of course, we will also take a look at improving the JPEG reader, but due to the many other tasks, I can't promise a quick solution. Ideally a contributor can...