Joseph Larmarange

So it would be equivalent to the total row in `tbl_cross()`

Dear @ddsjoberg It sounds very exciting. - I agree that it could be a good moment for a rewrite of core functions - working on `tbl_custom_summary()` is a good idea...

Quick question: should a rewrite be compatible with historical version of R or could it be developed only for R >= 4.2? Just using the new pipe could save some...

I completely agree. For users with an older version of R, it would still be possible to install version 1 (`remotes::insll_version()`), in particular if we communicate properly. A version 2...

@ShixiangWang is it an official fork? @NikNakk could you clarify if you still plan to maintain and develop `forestmodel`?

Thanks @NikNakk for your feedback. Regarding the proposed improvement, it should not be very difficult to implement once identified where variable names are taken into account. I didn't have time...

Thanks a lot

@NikNakk I have done some quick tests. It works well with simple models. Thanks. When I add interaction terms, labels are not taken into account for interaction terms, but it...

But I know that managing interaction terms could be tricky and beyond the current issue. Otherwise, it's perfect. Thanks a lot

Thanks