atom
atom copied to clipboard
Misuse of xacro name
Hello @miguelriemoliveira.
I think we have misused the "xacro" name a lot. After calibration we generate an URDF that does not use any xacro features, such as macros or properties.
I think it would be less confusing to call it URDF.
Right. I agree, we often are reffering to the URDF.
I agree, but what should we do? Is there anything to do on this issue or should we close?
I agree, but what should we do? Is there anything to do on this issue or should we close?
We should change the generated URDF to be only .urdf and not .urdf.xacro (the inital_estimate and the optimized one). Some prints also state xacro instead of urdf.
Right. Makes sense. Can you do it?