Public registry of Dify apps/workflows
Self Checks
- [X] I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
- [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
- [X] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue,否则会被关闭。谢谢!:)
- [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.
1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.
I'm too lazy to create a Dify app by myself, and instead want to use apps create by someone else. However, I use Dify self-hosted version and do not share the instance with others, which forces me to create all of the apps I need by myself. As a starting point, the default recommended apps are great but imo have the following disadvanteges:
- the list is completely static and does not seem well maintained
- They also do not cover very wide use cases
- Most of them are tuned for GPT, whereas I often use Claude
To improve the situation, this issue proposes a new feature, public registry for Dify apps. It has the following features:
- anyone who uses Dify (SaaS version or self-hosted version) shares the public registry
- anyone can publish their Dify apps to the registry
- Dify apps can be easily updated by an author (and collaborator)
- Each app can have tags for searching (e.g. LLM models like Claude, gpt or purposes like translation or email composing)
In short, I want a Dify version of npm. It will be a strong ecosystem to share and collabolate on LLM apps.
There can be a few obstacles to realize this feature, but I believe it will greatly improve Dify's value for uses like me. What do you think?
2. Additional context or comments
No response
3. Can you help us with this feature?
- [X] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
I found DifyShare. Looks cool. Ideally it'd be great if it is closely integrated with Dify itself (e.g. directly pulling/pushing workflow between DifyShare and Dify). Also we need more users for the service ;)