Landry Breuil

thanks @mdecimus , from my reading of https://github.com/inejge/ldap3/issues/117 it seems to be mostly a matter of having a release of `lldap` ?

ah and sorry for the initial wrong first comment, we 'need' ring 0.17 because *ring 0.16's assembly (from boringssl) isnt compatible with execute-only and missing landing pads for CFI* which...

why was this issue closed ? i see nothing changed wrt the transitive dependencies on ring 0.16..

just for tracking purposes so that i don't have to look again: - ldap3 was updated in master https://github.com/inejge/ldap3/commit/1cfe6a08148f11eefc7a96c5914fe240e422906a - needs a release from a 0.12 branch ? - hickory...

i agree with you that it's not efficient to display/parse/manage log files in a web interface, but it might be a handy feature for users :) should this issue be...