laminas-servicemanager
laminas-servicemanager copied to clipboard
Lack of infinite recursion detection for abstract factories
Bug Report
Q | A |
---|---|
Version(s) | 3.22.1, 4.0.0* |
Summary
There is a lack of infinite recursion detection for both get
and has
when it comes to abstract factories.
Ref: https://github.com/laminas/laminas-cache/issues/284
Current behavior
When checking a service via has
in factories (one abstract factory has to be involved) or receiving a service via get
, an infinite recursion along with an application crash is the result.
-
$container->has('foo');
- SM checks all
services
,aliases
andfactories
forfoo
-
foo
not found inservices
,aliases
orfactories
- SM checks all abstract factories for
foo
- First abstract factory which checks for
$container->has('foo');
will start over No. 1
How to reproduce
use Laminas\ServiceManager\Factory\AbstractFactoryInterface;
use Psr\Container\ContainerInterface;
final class GenericAbstractFactory implements AbstractFactoryInterface
{
public function canCreate(ContainerInterface $container, $requestedName)
{
if (!$container->has('foo')) {
return false;
}
$foo = $container->get('foo');
// check foo for whatever
return true; // or false, depending on what $foo represents
}
public function __invoke(ContainerInterface $container, $requestedName, ?array $options = null)
{
$foo = $container->get('foo'); // we can safely assume that `foo` exists since we checked that in `canCreate` alrady
// do whatever with foo
return stdClass(); // return service, maybe with data from foo
}
}
final class GenericFactory
{
public function __invoke(ContainerInterface $container): object
{
if (!$container->has('foo')) {
return new stdClass();
}
$foo = $container->get('foo');
// do whatever with foo
return new stdClass();
}
}
$container = new ServiceManager([
'abstract_factories' => [
GenericAbstractFactory::class,
],
'factories' => [
stdClass::class => GenericFactory::class,
],
]);
$object = $container->get(stdClass::class); // infinite loop occurs
// unreachable line
Expected behavior
Infinite recursions are prevented from abstract factories.
BTW, is this causing an infinite "loop" or infinite "recursion"?
I have to admit that I have no clue if and how there is a difference tbh.
The way I use "recursion" usually is that something is happening within the same class. This issue is actually passing a bunch of classes and methods which in the end leads to the same canCreate
method (in the has
trace) which then triggers the same process again:
-
$container->has('foo');
- SM checks all
services
,aliases
andfactories
forfoo
-
foo
not found inservices
,aliases
orfactories
- SM checks all abstract factories for
foo
- First abstract factory which checks for
$container->has('foo');
will start over No. 1
So no clue if this is actually an infinite loop or infinite recursion.
I would implement somthing like this:
https://github.com/laminas/laminas-servicemanager/blob/c97780e74ac5c2fdf2aa4876bccdc718b6fc6ed9/src/ServiceManager.php#L967-L980
if (isset($this->pendingAbstractFactoryChecks[$name])) {
return false;
}
$this->pendingAbstractFactoryChecks[$name] = $name;
foreach ($this->abstractFactories as $abstractFactory) {
if ($abstractFactory->canCreate($this->creationContext, $name)) {
unset($this->pendingAbstractFactoryChecks[$name]);
return true;
}
}
$resolvedName = $this->aliases[$name] ?? $name;
if ($resolvedName !== $name) {
if ($this->abstractFactoryCanCreate($resolvedName)) {
unset($this->pendingAbstractFactoryChecks[$name]);
return true;
}
}
unset($this->pendingAbstractFactoryChecks[$name]);
return false;
But I guess that the problem might be that we have to keep track of which abstract factory is currently being checked and just skip that abstract factory which was called lately so that all but the current one is being checked. So the code above might be too "dumb".
I have to admit that I have no clue if and how there is a difference tbh.
infinite loop runs forever. infinite recursion usually leads to a segfault/crash. an infinite loop would be much worse, right now.
I rephrased the issue and replaced loop
with recursion
. Thx for clarification.