PKGBUILD: Drop 32-bit support?

[lah7]

A couple of users mentioned about splitting the pkgbase so the 32-bit version isn't unnecessarily built.

• https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-classic#comment-801051
• https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-classic#comment-864715

I myself don't use lib32-gtk3-classic neither. I'd be happy to drop it if nobody uses/needs this package. Someone in the community could maintain a separate lib32-gtk3-classic AUR package if there is a need to keep it.

[robson-66]

I already proposed it over a year ago https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-classic#comment-801051

[jonathonf]

I personally don't see any reason for it - PKGBUILDs are not there for consumption by AUR helpers, and having lib32 support in the same place means halving the PKGBUILD maintenance burden.

[lah7]

I'm going to go ahead and drop the lib32-gtk3-classic package. For reasons:

• lib32-gtk3-classic doesn't build for GTK+ 3.24.36.

  • Strangely, I can't build lib32-gtk3 from official repos either despite having same make dependencies.

     gtk/gdk/meson.build:328:2: ERROR: Dependency "gobject-introspection-1.0" not found, tried pkgconfig and cmake
    

• lib32-gtk3 in the official repo is maintained by "Orphan". Not a good sign.
• Few dependants on lib32-gtk3, I would guess the majority of Arch users don't really need it as it's mostly optional.
• Ease maintenance for me. I never used/tested lib32-gtk3-classic.
• Faster compiling (2x) from AUR for everyone.
  • 🌍 Saves the planet and energy bills, I guess 😄

---

If any user does need a classic patched lib32-gtk3, they are welcome to use the last one: lib32-gtk3-classic 3.24.35, or switch to lib32-gtk3.

Of course, any one is welcome to create a new lib32-gtk3-classic AUR package and maintain a patched 32-bit version.