cli
cli copied to clipboard
Unsupported warning for ARM Macs
Description
ARM Macs are not fully supported at the moment for Kyma deployment. For this reason we need to show a clear warning to the user when using the CLI on an ARM Mac.
Use has to be asked whether he want to continue with the installation of abort it.
Wording: Mac M1 architecture is currently not supported by Kyma and the deployment can fail. Do you want to proceed?
AC:
- A message is shown when an ARM architecture is detected
- User has the option to decide to either continue with the deployment or to stop.
- If the application failed to detect the OS architecture, the warning will also be shown but without asking the user whether he want to proceed (it will continue automatically)
Reasons
Warn users of possible errors when using kyma with new macs until they are fully supported
Actually I think your draft is pretty good already. If anything, we could make it shorter:
Original:
Mac M1 architecture is currently not supported by Kyma and the deployment can fail. Do you want to proceed?
Shorter:
Kyma deployment on Mac M1 might fail. Do you want to proceed anyway?
I removed the "currently" because I assume the message won't be shown any longer once we're fully supporting M1.
That is correct, once it works the warning will go away.
Will apply the new message, thanks for the feedback.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to the lack of recent activity. It will soon be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue or PR has been automatically marked as stale due to the lack of recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 60d of inactivity,
lifecycle/stale
is applied - After 7d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stale
was applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale
- Close this issue or PR with
/close
If you think that I work incorrectly, kindly raise an issue with the problem.
/lifecycle stale
This issue or PR has been automatically marked as stale due to the lack of recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 60d of inactivity,
lifecycle/stale
is applied - After 7d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stale
was applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale
- Close this issue or PR with
/close
If you think that I work incorrectly, kindly raise an issue with the problem.
/lifecycle stale
What's the purpose of this ticket? In June, Borja said the warning text was used. Shouldn't that implementation have closed the issue?