Kevin W. Wall

First, my bad for not responding earlier. I was working on non-ESAPI related things that were taking up a lot of time. (Gasp!) @jeremiahjstacey Anyhow, I'm somewhat confused by your...

@planetlevel Jeff, would appreciate if you could take a read through this thread and give us your $.02 on what is intended / anticipated by these test results here. Thanks.

@jeremiahjstacey Yep; I think those changes to StringValidationRule is what caused these tests to fail. Just to double-check, I put back an older version (one that I had from the...

@jeremiahjstacey You wrote: > @planetlevel I believe I understand your point. Based on the documentation, the behavior of the SecurityRequestWrapper is doing exactly what it is intended to do. >...

@jeremiahjstacey You wrote "... and apologize for my side-track down that path". Please, no apology is necessary. If anyone should apologize it should be all those people who regularly use...

I just changed this from a **Critical** priority to a **Medium**. There are 2 reasons for that. 1) I don't think that ENHANCEMENTS (which this is) should be considered Critical....

First off, let me say that we knew that such "breakage" was possible. It was noted in ESAPI issue #588 (specifically, in my comment at https://github.com/ESAPI/esapi-java-legacy/issues/588#issuecomment-772313030). IMO, it was a...

@xeno6696 - My bad. Not sure how I missed that commit, especially when I was looking for it. I think I had false expectations that maybe you swapped the _formal_...

@xeno6696 - Now that you have a better grasp of the issue, do you think you could maybe suggest a revision of the issue title? I think what is listed...

@Aakash4396 -- only partly in jest, one thing that would probably speed up a fix for this if you could submit a PR to fix it. We'd credit you in...