kvid

Have you considered #116 and #121 for the [v0.2 milestone](https://github.com/formatc1702/WireViz/milestone/1)?

I just made a suggestion in the closed issue https://github.com/formatc1702/WireViz/issues/122#issuecomment-667545193. Do you think it should be reopened?

> Feel free to do so! I don't know how. Maybe I'm not authorized to do it.

> Not sure.. did it myself now :) Thank's > > Perhaps only repo owners (and maybe the original commenter) have the "reopen issue" button... You are right. I certainly...

When the PRs are ready and unless rejected by @formatc1702 , I suggest he merge them into `dev` in this order: #115, #164, #163, #153, and #111, but please give...

> Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't looked at the contributions in detail; just one question: > > Why not prioritize #153 and #111, which were planned for v0.2 already,...

> Short summary of the current situation: > > * #192 seems to be working, will re-review it soon and merge > * I am currently working on #186 and...

As #197 and #229 are already merged, #214 and #219 can follow in that order. I have rebased them both on top of the current `dev`. Please review them (anyone?)...

I think this project follows [PEP8 import guidelines](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#imports) more or less, but I think we should also consider sorting imports according to some common rules to reduce merge conflicts. Maybe...

You are right, it's currently designed for single colors only, and I admit this should have been stated more clearly in the [documentation](https://github.com/formatc1702/WireViz/blob/master/docs/syntax.md#connector-attributes). It probably is possible to expand this...