kvid

I know this issue was fixed in the `master` branch and therefore closed in 2021. However, multiple duplicate issues has later been reported because the fix is still not included...

I cherry-picked the fix for this issue into `dev` yesterday (see https://github.com/wireviz/WireViz/issues/316#issuecomment-1694685896 for details) and when the PR branches get rebased on top of `dev` again, then they also will...

As long as all wires (cores?) in the cable are numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. - then this is already supported, but custom numbering that differs from the sequence...

As far as I know, Graphviz doesn't support printing text on top of spline edges, and anyway I think it would've been tricky to obtain readable text on top of...

I'm sorry this PR hasn't got any attention since @MNiedzielski marked it ready for review several months ago. Please compare these suggested workflows and setup changes against some similar changes...

@formatc1702 wrote: > Would it make sense to only support the current Python version (3.12 as of now), at least officially? If we should support more than one Python version,...

@ferdnyc - Thank's a lot for filling a bit of the huge white spaces in my Python knowledge! 😃 1) I assume many of us worry about the resource or...

If this new fuctionality is intended as a feature, then it might be a solution to #294. However, in that case, it should not be the default option, IMHO, because...

@formatc1702 - thank you for the detailed explanation above. I now agree that the advantages with the new algorithm are probably greater than the disadvantage about breaking the old way...

- Thank you for sharing your usecase. It seems to be related to #293 and partly also #209. The order of the elements in each connection specify wires to be...