Andrei Kvapil

@ghernadi you're right, dmesg have no any messages about split-brain detection, but I'm worry that both devices are marked as `UpToDate` while only one is containing correct data. I've tried...

Here is reproducible case from another cluster: ```bash # linstor v l -r one-vm-11306-disk-0 ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ Node ┊ Resource ┊ StoragePool ┊ VolNr ┊ MinorNr ┊ DeviceName ┊ Allocated ┊...

ref: https://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2021-February/025818.html

This issue is starting annoying as it also repeatable on production cluster: ```bash # linstor r l -r one-vm-5629-disk-0 ╭─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ ResourceName ┊ Node ┊ Port ┊ Usage ┊ Conns...

Ah, I just got `ProtocolError`: ``` root@m9c6:~# drbdadm status one-vm-5629-disk-0 one-vm-5629-disk-0 role:Secondary disk:Outdated quorum:no m11c4 connection:Connecting m13c5 connection:ProtocolError ``` dmesg: ``` [Tue Feb 23 15:36:17 2021] drbd one-vm-5629-disk-0 m13c5: conn(...

Hi, any idea what is happened and how to debug this? ```bash # linstor r l -r one-vm-11169-disk-2 ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ ResourceName ┊ Node ┊ Port ┊ Usage ┊ Conns ┊...

No problem, I understand you might more important tasks than free community support 😉 1. It is reproducible for the specific resources, we have many of them 2. yes, we...

3. ``` linstor vd lp one-vm-11169-disk-2 0 ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ┊ Key ┊ Value ┊ ╞═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╡ ┊ DrbdCurrentGi ┊ 8C146BA58DADE3B4 ┊ ┊ DrbdOptions/Disk/discard-zeroes-if-aligned ┊ yes ┊ ┊ DrbdOptions/Disk/rs-discard-granularity ┊ 65536 ┊ ╰───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯...

Mainly I confused by this message: `Unrelated data, aborting!`, could you clarify in which cases it can occurs? I found some solution here, but this is a good question why...

Thank you for detailed explanation! > your case the first peer has a completely different GI and additionally also no history GIs May I ask how did you figure up...