Add VirtualIndex to store multiple Kuzzle collection in the same ES index

[TisserantG]

What does this PR do ?

Add virtual tenant

How should this be manually tested?

See functionnal test

Other changes

js -> ts for many files

[kuzzle]

	Fails
:no_entry_sign:	Found some issues !

Executed Checks

:heavy_check_mark: Branch Merge Check

:x: Changelog Tag Check

Pull Requests must have a changelog:XXX label. If you want to allow this PR to not have a changelog tag, add the following line to the PR body:

ci-no-changelog-tag

:heavy_check_mark: PR Body Check

Generated by :no_entry_sign: dangerJS against a70e1aec66481dede0557f50b6948afd64e10009

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #2375 (6ed64ca) into 2-dev (df27ac0) will decrease coverage by 0.69%. The diff coverage is 51.85%.

:exclamation: Current head 6ed64ca differs from pull request most recent head a70e1ae. Consider uploading reports for the commit a70e1ae to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            2-dev    #2375      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.12%   90.43%   -0.70%     
==========================================
  Files         116      109       -7     
  Lines        8125     6920    -1205     
==========================================
- Hits         7404     6258    -1146     
+ Misses        721      662      -59     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/api/httpRoutes.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)
lib/cluster/publisher.js	91.52% <0.00%> (-3.22%)	:arrow_down:
lib/cluster/subscriber.js	92.81% <20.00%> (-2.46%)	:arrow_down:
lib/cluster/node.js	97.10% <42.85%> (-1.13%)	:arrow_down:
lib/api/controllers/indexController.js	79.54% <66.66%> (-4.67%)	:arrow_down:
lib/core/shared/store.js	71.79% <100.00%> (+0.74%)	:arrow_up:
lib/kuzzle/internalIndexHandler.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/service/cache/redis.js	89.15% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/kuzzle/vault.js	30.00% <0.00%> (-55.00%)	:arrow_down:
lib/core/storage/clientAdapter.ts
... and 4 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud[bot]]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
28 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.1% Duplication

[TisserantG]

From what I see there is a lack of support of the m* method (mCreate etc)

Can you add at least 2 functional tests to ensure they are working? One with mCreate and one with any other action (because mCreate have optional IDs while all the other works the same with IDs)

Done

[Shiranuit]

There is also a lack of documentation on this feature

[sonarqubecloud[bot]]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
1 Security Hotspot
1 Code Smell

No Coverage information
0.1% Duplication

[Aschen]

Closed due to inactivity and de-priorized feature