Kurt Schelfthout

>You always do a good job making me question my own ideas 😳 It's always good with some feedback, because one can quickly get into a rut if only thinking...

For problem 1 > Add some Arbitrary implementation to the package. Problem with this is I created some dependency to FsCheck in my production code (package A). How about creating...

Since this is really constructing a type to function mapping, it's instructive to look at what other languages have done in this space - the "orphan rules". For example, in...

Could you give an example of what you’d like to see working, but doesn’t currently? Also to manage expectations: on FsCheck.NUnit I am happy to take PRs but unlikely to...

Yes I think this should be doable - again caveat my knowledge about NUnit is limited - but it seems like that should be a matter of routing FsCheck's output...

What doesn't work here? You should be able to use one of the portable FsCheck version.

No, but last time that was looked at mstest just doesn't support that kind of extensibility. You're better of using `ThrowOnFailure`. Has this changed in MSTest 2? If it's .NET...

Like I said, afaik MSTest has no extension points.

Since I don't really see how to support the wish here because of how MSTest works, I'm closing this.

Sure.