bungee
bungee copied to clipboard
kupix
Performance Comparisons
Hi. This looks like great work, and I'm interested in integrating it with a plugin I'm currently working on. I currently am using Rubberband, but Bungee seems to have a cleaner API and handles transients better. The only reason I'm hesitant to switch is for performance reasons. By any chance, have you done comparisons between the performance of different algorithms?
Hey, thanks for the kind comments. Regarding performance, Bungee is designed for speed, and the Pro edition has some nice optimisations. But I have only compared quality against others, not speed.
It should be quite easy to benchmark against Rubberband though: build the command line executables of both and measure how long each takes on the same task.
Yep, it seems quite fast. Around 22x real time on my machine, which is great because I want to integrate it into a sampler instrument. I'm unable to build the Rubberband CLI (I'm a bit of a newbie with this stuff), but it seems to have similar performance in my tests.
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 1:28 PM John Funnell @.***> wrote:
Hey, thanks for the kind comments. Regarding performance, Bungee is designed for speed, and the Pro edition has some nice optimisations. But I have only compared quality against others, not speed.
It should be quite easy to benchmark against Rubberband though: build the command line executables of both and measure how long each takes on the same task.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kupix/bungee/issues/3#issuecomment-2118169203, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7FVGN5VOV2UN4UAR6Z4QLZCZD6JAVCNFSM6AAAAABHYJKGJKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJYGE3DSMRQGM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>