[WIP] [Blog] Spotlight for k8s upstream training in Japan

[Okabe-Junya]

Description

We are the organizing team for the k8s upstream training in Japan. see https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/contributor-playground/tree/master/japan for more details We would like to feature our efforts in k/website blog!

Important Date

• We plan to move this PR out of draft status by early October
• We would like to publish this blog post within October

Let me know if you’d like any adjustments!

Issue

Closes: #

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	4f6626f6ebebdd1e5837823f43a7c5701c3db317
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/671ec1f7d09a600009e1aa8d
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-48039--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[Okabe-Junya]

/cc @shu-mutou @ziyi-xie @atoato88

[shu-mutou]

@Okabe-Junya Thanks for submittin this! LGTM for now. I look forward to hearing more about your interview! :smile:

[atoato88]

LGTM. Thank you for creating this blog post.

[ziyi-xie]

LGTM Thank you so much for the amazing content you created!

[Okabe-Junya]

/auto-cc

[Okabe-Junya]

/retitle [Blog] Spotlight for k8s upstream training in Japan

[Okabe-Junya]

/assign @nate-double-u @sftim

[Okabe-Junya]

Special thanks @mochizuki875 @ffjlabo !!

[sftim]

The November 10th publication target date is plausible, but because there is a very small pool of reviewers for both sites, I don't think it's likely.

[chris-short]

I feel like Contributor Comms can help make that happen.

Cc @kaslin @fsmunoz @mfahlandt

[Okabe-Junya]

Thank you, Tim and chris-short!

I see, considering our topic, it makes sense to post it on https://k8s.dev/blog/. I would like to create a PR later to post it on k8s.dev

but because there is a very small pool of reviewers for both sites, I don’t think it’s likely.

Ah, I saw a post about this topic on Slack. Of course, that’s not an issue. I want to take this opportunity to once again express my gratitude to you and your team for the tremendous contributions in running k/website blog.

[chris-short]

OK to unhold if: ...

And the canonical url is the K8s.dev site, right @sftim?

[Okabe-Junya]

Opened https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/pull/541! Thanks!

[Okabe-Junya]

Thank you for your review, @sandeepkanabar !!

[sftim]

Looks good - great read! Thanks for the effort on this! Just one nit - shouldn't we use Sentence Case for the headings? (Ref - style guide)

• Please provide feedback on https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/pull/541 (which this PR mirrors)
• but yes, [having the] headings in sentence case is better

[ArvindParekh]

Thanks, Tim! Frederico has already suggested the required edits there :)

[fsmunoz]

Yes, it was the only thing I could think that was an improvement 😀

[sftim]

/lgtm /approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 97a054a4773feb6e460dac47d3385dddfbefaa44

[sftim]

Previewed locally; all looks good

/lgtm /approve /hold cancel

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 7d13a3477d1ad8ae76bf132ff3d20939e4858bc4

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sftim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• ~~content/en/blog/OWNERS~~ [sftim]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment