Contribute as sig-docs reviewer blog post

[ricardoamaro]

This blog post aims to attract open-source contributors with Git/GitHub knowledge to become Kubernetes SIG-Docs reviewers.

cc/ @sftim

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	52ebe0472501fcd51ab84e071ac46f2ebca4a585
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/66454c164917e80007ab529b
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-46054--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[stmcginnis]

Nice!

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: abcbbccaed75f2746ceb0346635a6a859cce2070

[dipesh-rawat]

/remove-language pt /remove-area localization

[reylejano]

Amazing work coming up with this blog! I've included some review comments after a quick read-through.

This could also make a valuable addition to the contributor site's blog (Site: https://www.kubernetes.dev/blog/ ; Repo: https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site) plus this needs a formal publication date from the blog team.

+1 to this, you can publish this on kubernetes.dev and it can be mirrored on kubernetes.io

[ricardoamaro]

Moved to https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/pull/496

[sftim]

/hold

• pending confirmation of publication date
• pending reviews on the K8s contributor blog original of this article

OK to unhold when both are covered

[sftim]

/remove-language ja /remove-language zh

[sftim]

:information_source: Reviews should be upstream if possible.

[natalisucks]

ℹ️ Reviews should be upstream if possible.

ah, i now see that this is also on the contributor site, and the reviews on both are different – i hadn't seen this earlier, my apologies. given @jberkus' comments on the contributor site version, lets consider the contributor site verision to be the main source/area for work, and refrain from further reviews here until Josh's concern is addressed.

[ricardoamaro]

Thank you. I'll move all the suggestions to https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/pull/496

[reylejano]

Confirmed this is a mirror of what's merged on the contributor-site, https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site/blob/master/content/en/blog/2024/contribute-as-sig-docs-reviewer.md /approve

[sftim]

We can unhold this and fix the filename post merge. Not ideal but it feels like the least bad thing to do.

@dipesh-rawat I know you already have many tasks in flight. Are you willing to file a good-first-issue about doing that rename?

[sftim]

Feedback from https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/46054#pullrequestreview-2035560291 looks fixed.

/hold cancel

[sftim]

/lgtm /approve

(as a blog editor)

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 6a8784704cb0e5e0ad97f5dc246f2c892630f520

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: reylejano, sftim, tcarrondo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• ~~content/en/blog/OWNERS~~ [reylejano,sftim]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment