org icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
org copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon kubernetes

REQUEST: Archive repo https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/etcdadm

Open neolit123 opened this issue 1 year ago • 8 comments

Repository to archive

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/etcdadm

Repository and/or sig subproject owners that are approving this archival

@justinsb @dlipovetsky

When should this be done

anytime

Additional context for request

SIG CL is the owner the etcdadm subproject: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/etcdadm

the project was relatively low activity, but it contained one key component used by the kOps project - etcd-manager.

we opened the conversation on a ticket and on the SIG CL mailing list to archive the etcdadm repository: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/etcdadm/issues/395 https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-sig-cluster-lifecycle/c/SH463K1CmHs

in the meantime we extracted etcd-manager to a new subproject repo that is now owned by SIG etcd: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/etcd-manager

what is left for us to do is archive etcdadm.

neolit123 avatar Jun 11 '24 08:06 neolit123

cc @fabriziopandini @vincepri @hakman

neolit123 avatar Jun 11 '24 08:06 neolit123

/sig cluster-lifecycle etcd

neolit123 avatar Jun 11 '24 08:06 neolit123

/lgtm

fabriziopandini avatar Jun 11 '24 16:06 fabriziopandini

cc @hakman

Two things I would ideally like to get done first, but aren't technically blocking:

  1. We should decide whether we want to change the path of the image, as @neolit123 pointed out currently that it contains "etcdadm": registry.k8s.io/etcdadm/etcd-manager-slim:v3.0.20230925

  2. It would be nice if we had the build pipelines working on the new repo, I don't think we've set them up yet. The concern is that if there's a CVE (or similar), it might slow down a rapid release.

justinsb avatar Jun 11 '24 16:06 justinsb

@justinsb :

  1. For sure we will change the path to something like registry.k8s.io/etcd-manager/etcd-manager-slim. Not sure if registry.k8s.io/etcd-manager exists yet though.
  2. I think we can work on this in the next few weeks and should be relatively simple to get it working, assuming 1) is addressed. The risk should be minimal.

hakman avatar Jun 12 '24 07:06 hakman

guithub-team, we are ready to proceed with this archival. PTAL when possible.

neolit123 avatar Jun 25 '24 08:06 neolit123

  1. It would be nice if we had the build pipelines working on the new repo, I don't think we've set them up yet. The concern is that if there's a CVE (or similar), it might slow down a rapid release.

@justinsb FYI, build pipelines are working on the new etcd-manager repo, so there is no blocker remaining for archiving the etcdadm repo.

hakman avatar Jun 25 '24 09:06 hakman

k/community cleanup PR:

  • https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/7965

neolit123 avatar Jul 05 '24 07:07 neolit123

This archival is now complete.

cblecker avatar Jul 16 '24 14:07 cblecker

thanks @cblecker

neolit123 avatar Jul 16 '24 14:07 neolit123