wrong example in configmap help

[rgstori]

What happened: the fourth example in the configmap help (Create a new config map named my-config from the key=value pairs in the file) seems wrong - it's the same command as the first example:

Examples:
  # Create a new config map named my-config based on folder bar
  kubectl create configmap my-config --from-file=path/to/bar
  
  # Create a new config map named my-config with specified keys instead of file basenames on disk
  kubectl create configmap my-config --from-file=key1=/path/to/bar/file1.txt --from-file=key2=/path/to/bar/file2.txt
  
  # Create a new config map named my-config with key1=config1 and key2=config2
  kubectl create configmap my-config --from-literal=key1=config1 --from-literal=key2=config2
  
  # Create a new config map named my-config from the key=value pairs in the file
  kubectl create configmap my-config --from-file=path/to/bar
  
  # Create a new config map named my-config from an env file
  kubectl create configmap my-config --from-env-file=path/to/foo.env --from-env-file=path/to/bar.env

What you expected to happen:

have the fourth example use the --from-env-file option instead?

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):

run kubectl create configmap --help

Anything else we need to know?:

Environment:

• Kubernetes client and server versions (use kubectl version):

Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"23", GitVersion:"v1.23.5", GitCommit:"c285e781331a3785a7f436042c65c5641ce8a9e9", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2022-03-16T15:51:05Z", GoVersion:"go1.17.8", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"darwin/amd64"}

• Cloud provider or hardware configuration: any
• OS (e.g: cat /etc/os-release): MacOS 12.4

[wongearl]

/assign

[mpuckett159]

/triage accepted

[praveenrewar]

have the fourth example use the --from-env-file option instead?

Then I think that the 4th and 5th example would be similar. Maybe we can combine them to have one example? Something like this:

# Create a new config map named my-config from the key=value pairs in an env file
  kubectl create configmap my-config --from-env-file=path/to/foo.env --from-env-file=path/to/bar.env

/assign

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
• Close this issue or PR with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[watany-dev]

I found it, so I'll think of a simple idea and try to PR

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Close this issue or PR with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Reopen this issue with /reopen
• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

[k8s-ci-robot]

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Reopen this issue with /reopen
• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.