enhancements
enhancements copied to clipboard
WIP: Update KEP with criteria for GA
- One-line PR description: Update graduation criteria for GA
- Issue link: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/3329
- Other comments:
/sig node as a participating sig + the proposed changes involve kubelet
Please review
/assign @alculquicondor @soltysh for sig-apps POV /assign @bobbypage @SergeyKanzhelev for sig-node POV
@bobbypage @rphillips @smarterclayton ptal
I don't see any large issues with proposal here, but I suggested a few updates to the wording in the KEP to be a bit more precise on the changes here.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: mimowo, soltysh
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~keps/sig-apps/OWNERS~~ [soltysh]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
LGTM, but I think the official one belongs to SIG Node @SergeyKanzhelev
/assign @johnbelamaric for update to Prod Readiness questionnaire
@bobbypage @SergeyKanzhelev I've updated the PR, addressing the comments. PTAL and let me know if there is something more requiring an update.
I have one more comment about the terminology used in the KEP (terminating vs deleting), but LGTM on the content, thank you for all of the updates and clarifying the scenarios.
Thanks, this looks good from a PRR perspective, except we have added one question to the PRR this cycle: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/NNNN-kep-template/README.md?plain=1#L723 Can you answer that please?
Done, PTAL. The feature only introduces an additional API PATCH call, what is answered in the other point.
Ok, PRR looks good and is approved (no prow command needed this time, but want to make it explicit for the enhancements team).
Thanks for all the updates and clarifications in the KEP!
/lgtm
Thanks @bobbypage
I also reviewed it.
/lgtm /approve from SIG Node perspective.
@bobbypage @dchen1107 thank you for completing the review!