KEP-3280: Guarantee PodDisruptionBudget When Preemption Happens

[denkensk]

Signed-off-by: Alex Wang [email protected]

• One-line PR description: Adding new KEP for KEP-3280: Guarantee PodDisruptionBudget When Preemption Happens

• Issue link: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/3280

• Other comments:

[denkensk]

/cc @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-leads

[alculquicondor]

/assign I'll take this one

[denkensk]

/cc @kubernetes/sig-apps-leads /cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-leads

[denkensk]

/sig apps /sig auth

[denkensk]

The design document has been revised based on previous feedback, please help with another review, thank you. /cc @liggitt @alculquicondor

[wojtek-t]

@denkensk - this will require more work for Beta in the PRR section, but it's good to go for Alpha.

/label tide/merge-method-squash

/approve PRR

[alculquicondor]

/approve /hold for SIG Auth

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, denkensk, soltysh, wojtek-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• ~~keps/prod-readiness/OWNERS~~ [wojtek-t]
• ~~keps/sig-scheduling/OWNERS~~ [alculquicondor]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[denkensk]

Thank you all. Squashed. /cc @alculquicondor please help to add lgtm again, thanks.

[alculquicondor]

/lgtm

[alculquicondor]

/hold cancel

[ryanmcnamara]

Hi I'm wondering what the latest on this KEP is in terms of implementation. Thanks!

[alculquicondor]

@krmayankk this PR is already merged, can you instead post your comments in #4665?

[AxeZhan]

Hi I'm wondering what the latest on this KEP is in terms of implementation. Thanks!

@ryanmcnamara This will be tracked in a new KEP #4665.