KEP-3322: add a new field maxRestartTimesOnFailure to podSpec
Signed-off-by: kerthcet [email protected]
- One-line PR description: Add a new field maxRestartTimes to podSpec when running into RestartPolicyOnFailure
- Issue link: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/3322
- Other comments:
cc @wojtek-t PTAL, thanks a lot.
cc @wojtek-t PTAL, thanks a lot.
We're generally doing PRR once you already have SIG approval.
cc @dchen1107 for sig-node side review, also cc @hex108
This KEP is helpful especially for those pods that holds a large resource set such as the JVM based pod . We give these kinds of pods a high limit threshold to speed up their startup , restart always policy will make this worse , even the node crash. In the old days , daemon control tools like supervisorctl has its startretries mechanism to limit the max startup retries , but for k8s deployments there is no replacement for it .
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Reopen this PR with
/reopen - Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closedYou can:
- Reopen this PR with
/reopen- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
Any traction on this?
/reopen
@kerthcet: Failed to re-open PR: state cannot be changed. The feat/add-maxRetries-to-podSpec branch has been deleted.
In response to this:
/reopen
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
/reopen /remove-sig node /sig apps
@kerthcet: Reopened this PR.
In response to this:
/reopen /remove-sig node /sig apps
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
cc @soltysh would you mind to take a look?
kindly ping @kubernetes/sig-node-leads
/cc
I'll polish this design doc with more details ASAP, thanks all.
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Deadline is in ~8 hours -- Is this still hoping to land?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: drinktee, kerthcet Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from wojtek-t and additionally assign derekwaynecarr for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
hey, it's 2024, any update?
/lifecycle frozen
@adampl: The lifecycle/frozen label cannot be applied to Pull Requests.
In response to this:
hey, it's 2024, any update?
/lifecycle frozen
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.
This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the PR is closed
You can:
- Mark this PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle rotten
@kerthcet Are you going to work on this?
FYI on a somewhat related KEP #4603
@alculquicondor I'm trying to see if this is a KEP that sig-node should help review for 1.32.