community icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
community copied to clipboard

Update stale docs about OWNERS files

Open VannTen opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

Should avoid to the next maintainer looking at OWNERS files docs to needlessy avoid filters for use with approvers

/sig contribex

VannTen avatar May 30 '24 09:05 VannTen

@VannTen: The label(s) sig/contribex cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

Should avoid to the next maintainer looking at OWNERS files docs to needlessy avoid filters for use with approvers

/sig contribex

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot avatar May 30 '24 09:05 k8s-ci-robot

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

k8s-triage-robot avatar Nov 25 '24 03:11 k8s-triage-robot

/remove-lifecycle stale

/assign @mrbobbytables for approval

Priyankasaggu11929 avatar Nov 25 '24 05:11 Priyankasaggu11929

This PR originally included something similar to 0fc7f1615b8799e6b25d15b26b8dfb15f8430e35 , I hadn't notice that the needs-rebase was because that commit was included ; and doing the rebase made the PR description out of sync with it's content.

VannTen avatar Nov 25 '24 08:11 VannTen

This PR originally included something similar to 0fc7f16 , I hadn't notice that the needs-rebase was because that commit was included ; and doing the rebase made the PR description out of sync with it's content.

Thanks for the clarification, @VannTen

(I think I can approve too, trying) /approve

Priyankasaggu11929 avatar Nov 26 '24 06:11 Priyankasaggu11929

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mrbobbytables, Priyankasaggu11929, VannTen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

k8s-ci-robot avatar Nov 27 '24 18:11 k8s-ci-robot