Uplifted packages to address CVEs

[silivanmunguar]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Provides a fix for vulnerabilities (CVEs) which enhances the security of the platform.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jfvp-7x6p-h2pv Fixes https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vfvj-3m3g-m532 Fixes https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mc76-5925-c5p6 Fixes https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vvgc-356p-c3xw Fixes https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hcg3-q754-cr77

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

 Uplifted go packages to versions that provide fixes to the following CVEs in the 
| CVE ID |  Type | Target | Package |	                    
| ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- |
| CVE-2024-45310 |	gobinary |  usr/bin/kube-scheduler    | github.com/opencontainers/runc	            |
| CVE-2023-27483 | gobinary |  usr/bin/kube-scheduler    | github.com/crossplane/crossplane-runtime |
| CVE-2024-9341   | gobinary | usr/bin/kube-scheduler	    | github.com/containers/common	            |
| CVE-2025-22872 |	gobinary |  usr/bin/kube-scheduler    | golang.org/x/net	                                    |
| CVE-2025-22869 | gobinary |  usr/bin/kube-scheduler    | golang.org/x/crypto	                                    |

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-scheduler-plugins canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	133f51236eae722829556dc22b284db11446e9d5
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-scheduler-plugins/deploys/68373dc69de8620008498d1b

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @silivanmunguar. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[silivanmunguar]

@seanmalloy @Tal-or @PiotrProkop could I get one of you to okay this for testing and hopefully get it merged?

[Huang-Wei]

/ok-to-test

[silivanmunguar]

@Huang-Wei thanks for test okay. I would appreciate a review; I am hoping to address a critical CVE in an upcoming release.

[nicole-romeroo]

Hi @Huang-Wei, just checking in on this PR. Please let us know if there is anything we can do to help move the review forward. Thanks.

[nicole-romeroo]

Hi @seanmalloy @PiotrProkop @swatisehgal @Tal-or. This PR states that we need a "lgtm" or "approved" label in order to merge. Please let us know if there is anything we can do to help move the review forward. Thanks!

[Travisivart]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

@Travisivart: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[kannon92]

/lgtm

I feel that this is a valid change.

/assign @ffromani @Huang-Wei

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Huang-Wei, silivanmunguar, Travisivart

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• ~~OWNERS~~ [Huang-Wei]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment