Unexpected behaviour with strategic merge patch
When performing a $patch: delete I am getting unexpected behaviour.
api deployment config:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: api-deployment
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
component: api
template:
metadata:
labels:
component: api
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx
- name: memcached
image: memcached
kustomization.yaml
resources:
- api.yaml
patches:
- patch: |-
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: api-deployment
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- $patch: delete
name: memcached
When I am doing this, I am getting the container with name: memcached removed but when I change the kustomization.yaml with
resources:
- api.yaml
patches:
- patch: |-
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: api-deployment
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- $patch: delete
image: memcached
It is deleting both the container
output for 2nd kustomization.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: api-deployment
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
component: api
template:
metadata:
labels:
component: api
spec:
containers: []
both image: memcached and name: memcached can be used to match, if not how are both the containers being removed?
The mergeKey for containers is the name, there is no match in your example so it applied on the full list I guess
@sda399 is right. image key is not used to filter and so it applies to all.
/triage out-of-scope
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen - Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.