[KEP] Extend `WaitForPodsReady` config by `.waitForAdmissionChecks` field

[PBundyra]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Describes API extension for WaitForPodsReady which expands it's functionality to AdmissionChecks, to prevent wasteful allocation of resources and starvation.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #3231

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

[PBundyra]

/assign @mimowo cc @mwielgus

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	c27dc8a510d7154f5ffbe2e98828ddf9963852d0
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/670d352a7b66de00082528ed

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: PBundyra Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from mimowo. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tenzen-y]

/cc

@mimowo @PBundyra Will this be marked as a must-have for the next release? I need to prioritize features for the next releases on my side.

[PBundyra]

/cc

@mimowo @PBundyra Will this be marked as a must-have for the next release? I need to prioritize features for the next releases on my side.

It shouldn't block the release, but it's a strong nice-to-have

[tenzen-y]

It shouldn't block the release, but it's a strong nice-to-have

I see. It seems that there are a few strong nice-to-have...