external-dns icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
external-dns copied to clipboard

fix(helm): make use of resource values for webhook

Open crutonjohn opened this issue 1 year ago • 5 comments

Description

The resource limits set by the user when leveraging the webhook sidecar should be respected and implemented when they are passed via helm values. This change alters the deployment template to use those limits if they are set in the values. I believe this was intended to work when it was first implemented but never had the supporting logic added to the deployment template.

I didn't see and issue for this (surprisingly).

Checklist

  • [ ] Unit tests updated
  • [ ] End user documentation updated

crutonjohn avatar Jun 18 '24 18:06 crutonjohn

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • :white_check_mark: login: crutonjohn / name: Curtis John (92df16dde77e859677694d1e30bdb8aa88accc75, 776e47fa028f76adc37c8a194e44c3a291c501ae)

Welcome @crutonjohn!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. :smiley:

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jun 18 '24 18:06 k8s-ci-robot

Hi @crutonjohn. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jun 18 '24 18:06 k8s-ci-robot

/check-cla

crutonjohn avatar Jun 18 '24 18:06 crutonjohn

@mkilchhofer: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot avatar Jul 21 '24 19:07 k8s-ci-robot

/assign @stevehipwell

this has been stagnant for a little bit now

crutonjohn avatar Jul 30 '24 12:07 crutonjohn

/lgtm

mloiseleur avatar Aug 10 '24 07:08 mloiseleur

/approve

stevehipwell avatar Aug 15 '24 12:08 stevehipwell

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mkilchhofer, stevehipwell

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

k8s-ci-robot avatar Aug 15 '24 12:08 k8s-ci-robot