controller-runtime
controller-runtime copied to clipboard
Properly exit when cert-watcher can no longer watch required file
When the TLS assets are no longer available (missing drive for example) after a webhook server is started with such TLS assets, the cert-watcher throws the following error: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/blob/4d10a0615b11507451ecb58bfd59f0f6ef313a29/pkg/certwatcher/certwatcher.go#L144
{"level":"error","ts":1636596243.6302137,"logger":"controller-runtime.certwatcher","msg":"error re-watching file","error":"no such file or directory","stacktrace":"github.com/go-logr/zapr.(*zapLogger).Error\n\t/go/src/github.com/open-policy-agent/gatekeeper/vendor/github.com/go-logr/zapr/zapr.go:132\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/log.(*DelegatingLogger).Error\n\t/go/src/github.com/open-policy-agent/gatekeeper/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/log/deleg.go:144\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/webhook/internal/certwatcher.(*CertWatcher).handleEvent\n\t/go/src/github.com/open-policy-agent/gatekeeper/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/webhook/internal/certwatcher/certwatcher.go:144\nsigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/webhook/internal/certwatcher.(*CertWatcher).Watch\n\t/go/src/github.com/open-policy-agent/gatekeeper/vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/webhook/internal/certwatcher/certwatcher.go:102"}
After throwing the following error, the cert-watcher simply stops monitoring the path without further action. The last valid certificate persists in currentCert even after the path becomes available again. I wonder if it is better if the cert-watcher can either:
- call
os.exitafter the path missing error occurs - keeps monitoring the path even if it is missing
Happy to do a PR if possible.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
This is one blog explaining k8s fsnotfy, looks cert-watcher can not handle secret mounted in container.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue or PR with
/reopen - Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue or PR with
/reopen- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
/reopen
@ichekrygin: You can't reopen an issue/PR unless you authored it or you are a collaborator.
In response to this:
/reopen
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
To be honest, I would be really surprised if the certwatcher "can not handle secret mounted in container.". As far as I'm aware that is the standard case with controller-runtime and folks have running this in production for a very long time (also in combination with certificates managed by cert-manager that are rotated every few weeks).
Maybe I'm missing something. Definitely fine to investigate further and if there is evidence that we have a problem fix it.
/remove-lifecycle rotten /reopen
@sbueringer: Reopened this issue.
In response to this:
To be honest, I would be really surprised if the certwatcher "can not handle secret mounted in container.". As far as I'm aware that is the standard case with controller-runtime and folks have running this in production for a very long time (also in combination with certificates managed by cert-manager that are rotated every few weeks).
Maybe I'm missing something. Definitely fine to investigate further and if there is evidence that we have a problem fix it.
/remove-lifecycle rotten /reopen
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.