How to close stdin in a `exec` response?
What is the feature and why do you need it: I have the use case to do the python equivalent of
cat $local_file | kubectl exec command_in_container
I have been able to use something like this
core_api = client.CoreV1Api(api_client)
stream_response: WSClient = stream(
core_api.connect_get_namespaced_pod_exec, pod_name,
pod_namespace, command=command,
stdin=True,
stdout=False,
stderr=True,
_preload_content=False,
)
# Ideally I need to do streaming-write, but for sake of example, just a text:
if input_text:
stream_response.write_stdin(input_text)
But here's the problem. The process invoked on container through the exec command needs to know the input has ended. I don't find a way to close the stdin of the command.
Describe the solution you'd like to see:
I think ideally we have a function to close the stdin
response.close_stdin()
Need to check how go client and kubectl handles this.
On golang / kubectl side, it seems client-go library handles this
https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/blob/b3c87441408e747a62785f2f1478de64d9da5293/tools/remotecommand/v2.go#L98
i think this is not implemented currently in python.
Is there a workaround?
You can probably encode the input as base64 and have a wrapper function / process break on newline.
On Tue, 6 May, 2025, 4:05 am Mick van Gelderen, @.***> wrote:
mickvangelderen left a comment (kubernetes-client/python#2371) https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/issues/2371#issuecomment-2852505648
Is there a workaround?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/issues/2371#issuecomment-2852505648, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALAKLFRMTWBOVHRDMKO2NEL247RRNAVCNFSM6AAAAABYS6YBFSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQNJSGUYDKNRUHA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
I've stumbled upon the same problem. As a test, I'm trying to reproduce the result of echo hello | kubectl exec -i simple-server-pod -- tr a-z A-Z, but fail to do so with the python API.
The only way I kinda get it to work is by setting tty to True and writing <string>\x04 (i.e. appending a End of Transmission byte at the end, or Ctrl-D). TTY mode ensure the byte is interpreted properly, but comes with other, undesirable side effects, such as echoing the input.
As @mahesh-hegde noticed, the go client seems to do some proper closing magic, I do not fully understand (it seems to read from the channel until it's closed by the server, I think) and have no clue how to emulate.
I'd like to get this working in python, as the alternative would be calling kubectl to do my bidding, which seems unnecessary.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen - Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.