Upgrade to openapi-generator >= v6.4.0: `DeprecationWarning: HTTPResponse.getheaders() is deprecated`
What happened (please include outputs or screenshots): Certain k8s API calls (f.e. deleting a namespace) result in the following deprecation warnings:
venv-test/lib/python3.9/site-packages/kubernetes/client/rest.py:44: DeprecationWarning: HTTPResponse.getheaders() is deprecated and will be removed in urllib3 v2.1.0. Instead access HTTPResponse.headers directly.
return self.urllib3_response.getheaders()
F.e., see at the bottom of this test log: https://source.cloud.google.com/results/invocations/0cb2a704-d3b4-40a5-9d85-36e2e7dbc64f/targets/grpc%2Fjava%2Fv1.57.x%2Fbranch%2Fxds_k8s_lb%2Fround_robin_test/log
This has already been reported in #2024, but since then OpenApi generator released the fix in v6.4.0.
- PR with the fix: https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/pull/14743
- fixed rest.py template in v6.4.0
- v6.4.0 changelog: https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/releases/tag/v6.4.0.
What you expected to happen: No deprecation warnings logged.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): The warning is shown when kubernetes library is used within the unittest context, which enables all warnings per
Developers of test runners for Python code are advised to instead ensure that all warnings are displayed by default for the code under test — https://docs.python.org/3/library/warnings.html#overriding-the-default-filter
I'm not entirely sure in what exact cases this warning is produced, but it's easy to verify when it's fixed.
Check the generated code RESTResponse.getheaders():
https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/blob/76ec6f5ce5572f66d82717e296480dc42584f0b7/kubernetes/client/rest.py#L42-L45
This should be replaced with
def getheaders(self):
"""Returns a dictionary of the response headers."""
return self.urllib3_response.headers
Environment:
Kubernetes version
kubectl version:
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"25+", GitVersion:"v1.25.9-dispatcher", GitCommit:"6ed97cc2601c54f907320513513db38e446aa2ee", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2023-05-09T18:05:38Z", GoVersion:"go1.19.8", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"darwin/amd64"}
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"25", GitVersion:"v1.25.10-gke.1200", GitCommit:"9e9cdb04efcc29a8fe0b1804cdcc8054b9ee176a", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2023-06-01T19:57:47Z", GoVersion:"go1.19.9 X:boringcrypto", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Python client version
The latest kubernetes==27.2.0 is affected.
We need to upgrade the openapi generator to pick up the fix. There has been someone working on it but it hasn't landed yet.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen - Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
/reopen The latest kubernetes==30.1.0 is still affected.
/help
@yliaog: This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.
Guidelines
Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions:
- Why are we solving this issue?
- To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points?
- Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry?
- How can the assignee reach out to you for help?
For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see here and ensure that they are met.
If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-help command.
In response to this:
/help
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.