WG ML Experience proposal - second round of review

[ederign]

This PR is a FUP of requested changes on https://github.com/kubeflow/community/pull/824.

[ederign]

/assign @andreyvelich

[google-oss-prow[bot]]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from andreyvelich. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[franciscojavierarceo]

I vote in favor of WG ML Experience WG. 👍

CC @kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee

[juliusvonkohout]

I vote in favor of WG ML Experience. 👍

CC @kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee

[johnugeorge]

+1(binding)

[andreyvelich]

I vote in favor of WG ML Experience WG. 👍

I will review the updated charter after KubeCon + CloudNativeCon. Thank you for this huge effort @ederign @StefanoFioravanzo, excited to keep pushing this forward! 🚀

cc @akshaychitneni @lresende @shravan-achar @zsailer @bigsur0

[StefanoFioravanzo]

Thank you all! Can't wait to get started!

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity.You can reopen the PR if you want.