Tom Klingenberg

> `#!/bin/bash `#! /bin/sh` then check the script is using only portable syntax (e.g. no [_bashism_](https://mywiki.wooledge.org/Bashism)).

Sure, it is always more convenient when problems are already solved - so they won't surface ;) - but for that the problems need to be known, and see your...

@sebastianfeldmann can you please change the issue title and add " in docker mode" at the end to have a better description?

@renky nice tests. but nevertheless it is possible to add some precautions (for which I can offer help when drafting a PR and in review). Do you think it is...

I could work around this by removing the installation db like; ~~~ $ rm -rf ~/.phive/phars ~~~ I could not work-around with `--temporary` for `install` command.

Yes, I think on install if phive finds the phar in the database, it should check if the entry is orphaned and if so, just download again. To check whether...

I just did remember an earlier issue (https://github.com/ktomk/pipelines/issues/1) where a file was checked readable before processing it. I then had a false negative. I just checked it again. `file_exists` might...

Yeah, it took me a bit to understand what the issue for the user was. I explained the reason to myself in the end like this: Because the process binary...

@sebastianbergmann: I could only guess, but SELinux policy maybe makes no difference between the two for the case the user reported.

@CyExy: Could it be the pre-fetching of consumers which you described as being status-quo in your recent comment is limited and does not fully work? Is this perhaps already reported?...