Kevin Stich

From [the specification on deriving condition keys](https://smithy.io/2.0/aws/aws-iam.html#deriving-condition-keys): >A resource's condition keys include those that are inferred from their identifiers, including the resource's ancestors, and those applied via the [aws.iam#conditionKeys trait](https://smithy.io/2.0/aws/aws-iam.html#aws-iam-conditionkeys-trait)...

Yes, it is. This functionality has been in place for quite some time, however, so we adjusted `aws.iam#disableConditionKeyInference` to be applicable at the service level.

We'll need to investigate if/how other alterations to CloudFormation Resource Schema generation are being made to validate these are the stable shapes for these traits. Should include resolution on #923...

This is a subtlety to a few pieces of modeling: #. `create` is for operations where the identifier is service-provided. #. The `ResourceOperationInputOutputValidator` only checks here when a `resource` has...

Closing as this is something we do not plan to support in Smithy.

Are you looking for more than what's exposed in [the `SmithyBuildConfig` class](https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy/blob/main/smithy-build/src/main/java/software/amazon/smithy/build/model/SmithyBuildConfig.java)? If so, can you elaborate on what differences you're looking for?

Correct, closing as a duplicate of #2279

If this is failing when trying to fetch, the `git init .` has failed in some way. The `.git` directory is created as part of that command.

👋 Things are good, hoping the same for you! It sounds like you're looking to generate "type"-only code for the shapes in a Smithy model, not a client or service...

This is possible in [smithy-java](https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy-java/), with [an example of it available here](https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy-java/tree/0.0.1/examples/standalone-types). A [PR with support for this is up in `smithy-python`](https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy-python/pull/373) as well. Support in Rust and Go would...