Krixano

GPLv3-only and Lax

Making sure the second-half of the list of contributors get properly mentioned: @xfq @6543 @ajmeese7 @AceLewis @megfault @zasei @artemmolotov @Nephos @Austin-Williams @bencevans @valkheim @d14na @thesoftwarejedi @Derson5 @dldx @EdenSG @camponez @Erkan-Yilmaz...

@rwv @sinkuu @zwgshr

Just some useful information for people: > Sometimes open-source software projects get stuck in a license incompatibility situation. Often the only feasible way to resolve this situation is re-licensing of...

Additionally, if you want to find out more about different licenses, http://tldrlegal.com seems to be a decent resource.

Maybe.. but we shouldn't be dictating completely what people can choose from, because they have to choose it for themselves (legally). Also, I didn't really add that many more choices....

Btw, **polite** discussion on licenses are welcome and you can change your vote at any time by posting another comment.

> We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. GPLv3+ allows for auto-upgrade to later versions. Honestly, I don't see why anyone would **ever** want that. If someone could...

> Of course not. GPLv3+ means that anyone is free to choose any of licenses that fall under "version 3 or later.." definition. You can take it and limit version...

GPLv3 and Lax