Krishna Harsha Voora

@gerrith3 ^^^ FYI - can you provide your perspective on how we can enhance the experience to the node-sass community via TravisCI?

@nschonni FWIW - Here's another TravisCI document which states its free for IBM sponsored resources like ppc64le & s390x - https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/billing-overview/#partner-queue-solution

Hi @xzyfer - Thanks for your feedback/ response. Yes, we would want the release cycle lined up as well. I am currently investigating an Appveyor config from the current/ older...

Closing this, as this is addressed/

> /test e2e-ingress-perf-single-node Will update my DCO related changes after this run :-)

Hi **@unleashed**, Thanks for your response, I agree with the latter proposal, for now, we can enable the ppc64le architecture via Travis Pipeline. I will work on a PR and...

Additionally, are the binaries/ container image published? If so, what will be the location?

Thanks for your review & merge - @unleashed > don't know if quay.io supports building ppc64le directly AFAIK, we can build the container images on ppc64le architecture and push them...

Hi @unleashed - The short answer to this is no - > don't know if quay.io supports building ppc64le directly via the build - trigerrs For multi-arch, with help of...

@liqcui Can you please sign-off the PR?