Lion Krischer

#2184 raises an error so it will "fix" the issue from @Brtle's example. @lachaudc I think your example has a different problem. Do you have a self-contained small example somewhere...

I can confirm this. The code no longer faults if `i2+nl_p` is replaced with `ndat` (the actual length of the arrays) in the following code snippet as mentioned above. The...

I actually feel quite strongly that we should NOT remove this for at least the next couple of releases. We broke backwards compatibility once with `1.0.0` and it was fairly...

An initial implementation of this or of #1718 would not be that much work I think. Testing and making sure it does not break anything would though - one would...

See #1562.

yea

I'm personally quite happy to see some work on this 👏 Unfortunately some things got messed up in the git history of this branch. Can you rebase this on the...

> I've gone ahead and merged in this pull request: [amkearns-usgs#4](https://github.com/amkearns-usgs/obspy/pull/4) > > My thought is that while most of the scipy code is in C and probably well-optimized (possibly...

> Working from the response test code (https://github.com/obspy/sandbox/tree/master/the_great_response_test_scipy) one of the responses is failing specifically because the phase is off by 180 degrees (pi rad). 1.57 is expected but -1.57...

I guess this would also be easy to implement programmatically and then it can work on the internal graph structure. Why is this closed?