Kurtis Rader

> Wouldn't an --on-function-return option be essentially the same as, e.g.: .... No, because the intent is for the caller to be unaware that some cleanup actions might be needed....

> Couldn't you write the function as a separate script and call it as a command? In some cases, yes, but not if the function needs to modify the state...

> The idea of a function with hidden side effects modifying the state of the current shell shivers me timbers. It shouldn't. A lot of functions do so; consider the...

It's pretty clear that this is not going to be fixed as part of the 2.3.0 release milestone so I'm punting this back to next-2.x.

I'm removing the "next-2.x" label because this has been open for three years. There is no reason to think this will become a priority to fix anytime soon.

While fixing #4222 I updated the `psub` documentation to clarify that `--file` is the default behavior. I also added a new `--fifo` flag to request the use of a named...

Note that the design of that feature is a bit fubar as it controls both the timeout of the `read` command as well as how long an interactive shell will...

Accessing a VPS (virtual private server) via its console is an interesting case I hadn't thought of. However, you're presumably not using a real RS232 serial connection. Shouldn't whatever is...

@decomposite: You should look at how `fish_escape_delay_ms` is handled for an example of how to have fish alter its behavior based on a variable that might be present as an...

> Is it okay if we leave this issue open while I get around to it? As long as the other core devs don't have any objections to implementing the...