Kurtis Rader

> yes, return the original string and return one to indicate no stripping happening (although consistency with other string subcommands should be the key consideration about return values; I’m not...

@admackin: While a couple of the finer points might still be open for debate I think there is sufficient understanding for how this feature should work to proceed. We're always...

Note that we can't implement `{2..7}` syntax without a major release because it is not backward compatible. And while this is possible using subcommands that invoke `seq` and `echo` that...

Seems reasonable to me. Most search engines default to case-insensitive and may not even provide a case-sensitive search option. Having fish behave the same way is likely to be less...

> I haven't contributed to fish-shell before. That's okay. We're always interested in seeing people contribute to the core C++ code. We're happy to get you pointed in the right...

See also issue #2538 which is closely related.

> Are there any plans to add multithreading support to functions in the near future? No. With 530 open issues as I type this patches are welcomed.

> Bash provides backgrounded subshells with consistent behaviour, fish does not. I have no idea where you got that idea. What exactly is wrong with simply using fish to do...

I noticed the same problem. It also appears to be impossible to create maps that provide the equivalent of "set clipboard=unnamedplus". I'm going to explore the possibility of creating an...

I can't reproduce the problem. The solution seems dubious as it appears to be doing nothing other than adding an exceedingly tiny and random delay to capturing the output of...