Awesome-GANs
Awesome-GANs copied to clipboard
kozistr
[rework] rework w/ paper list
- Select some of the papers which have impacts and important as i think,
- Summary all of the papers within 3 lines!
- Grouping the papers w/ following characteristic
Agreed, but the problem is that more and more papers are coming out, especially with the recorrection with https://github.com/nightrome/really-awesome-gan Is it possible to judge a paper based on the amount of times it get referenced by other papers (assume metrics by SemanticScholar and ResearchGate)?
Agreed, but the problem is that more and more papers are coming out, especially with the recorrection with https://github.com/nightrome/really-awesome-gan Is it possible to judge a paper based on the amount of times it get referenced by other papers (assume metrics by SemanticScholar and ResearchGate)?
reference count usually is a good metric for judging the paper, but in case of purpose of this repo, is not as i think! so, not recommending all of GAN papers, but the paper what i and others think it is good to read ( based on my and others experiences).
In that case, besides popularity, there should be a "uniqueness" factor, since many GANs can be abstracted away to having the same meta-structure. See https://github.com/kozistr/Awesome-GANs/issues/18 for some examples. Of course I would hope that more varieties of meta-structures would lead to more innovation, but then again that is just hope if implementing all GANs are impossible.